Aquascaping World
Aquascaping Home Register
ASW Membership Map Support ASW Aquatic Database Coming Soon

Go Back   Aquascaping World Forum > General Aquascaping Forums > AquaScaping World Magazine Discussions

Notices

AquaScaping World Magazine Discussions Talk to the authors and discuss the articles from AquaScaping World Magazine with other readers.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-10-2008, 12:59 PM   #1 (permalink)
Administrator
 
John N.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 1,242
Default The Estimative Index Fertilization Method

Please discuss and comment on Tom Messenger's The Estimative Index Fertilization Method here.



-John N.
John N. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2008, 04:30 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Aquascaper
 
Pat7676's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Jackson, Mississippi
Posts: 753
Send a message via Yahoo to Pat7676
Default

This is a good article on EI method explains it very well. Can you do this without using traces? Also what are good traces?
Pat7676 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2008, 10:34 AM   #3 (permalink)
Junior Aquascaper
 
Left C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Burlington, NC
Posts: 2
Default

Hi John

You say the following in this article about EI and it's not really accurate: "Sometimes, but not necessarily, people will add Magnesium Sulphate (MgSO4) to help with the buffering capacity of the water (measured as KH)."

MgSO4 or more commonly used MgSO4∙7H2O increases GH and not KH. Carbonates and Bicarbonates increase KH.

Take care,
Left C
Left C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2008, 10:01 PM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Aquascaper
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: California, USA
Posts: 104
Default

I'll ask a simple question: how does a plant grow?

Nutrients alone?

Clearly not.
Light comes to mind as the first requirement.

CO2 is next but only suggest 30ppm.
This too is not correct.
While at HIGH light, 30ppm CO2 will saturate some plant species, at lower light, say 80 micro moles, the demand might only be at 15 ppm or less.

The problem with most discussions about nutrients are where the nutrients are located(sediment, fish waste, water column) and the other factors, such as CO2 gas addition and how much light you have.

Common sense goes right out the door.

EI works best for high light and very dense planting is not true. EI can and does work fine at low light, at less than dense plantings. You obviously do not need to add so much for tanks, it's likely wasteful, you know the plants are not using that much nutrients but you still dose the same amount simply because "so and so" said so?

Nope.

If you have a nutrient rich sediment, say ADA aqua soil, do you still need full EI? No, you can reduce the macros by say 1/2 and still maintain the traces. Sediments supply another source, so the full demand on the water column will be less.

I suggest for a low light tank, say 80 micro mol, 10-12 hour day, about 1/3 EI, and about weekly water change every 2-3 weeks.

Likewise, some folks like water changes 2x a week say 20% vs 50% once a week, you can do 80% every two weeks etc, you just need to figure how much possible build up is there.

You can tweak the dosing using some good test kits also if you chose.
But folks have lots of trouble using test kits correctly and are often too cheap(Rarely buy the Lamotte or high quality equipment) and forgetful to use them well over time.

With good reason too.

"Not using test kits" is a huge a selling point for the method if you can do weekly 50% water changes, and never build up beyond the 2x max weekly dosage.

Some add EI without any modification, some think you must do 50% water changes weekly, some add it on non CO2 tanks, some have hardly any light and think they are not adding enough KNO3 when doing full EI.

Folks have trouble measuring CO2 well.
Folks do not even measure light.

It's just a concept to dose non limiting nutrients and do water changes to reduce the build up.

Not much more than that.
You start at a high known non limiting amount, then reduce it down from there slowly and progressively till you hit a sour effect with the plants, and then bump it back up to the next highest level.

The actual amounts suggested do not cause algae at high light levels(and therefore cannot induce algae at any other lesser values as well) in and of themselves, this is true no matter how bad folks want to claim otherwise(and many still cannot get this out of their heads).

So that leaves CO2 and light as the main controlling issues for growth.

Using GH booster is my general suggestion for Ca,Mg, and K+ added extras.
They do no harm when adding a bit extra to supplement just in case you are low, basically going back to the idea of non limiting nutrients.

You can easily provide non limiting amounts of nutrients, then focus on what really matters, good CO2 dosing/light without interference from the nutrients.

Light and CO2 are much more difficult to address.
But should never be left from the discussion.

We should look at the whole process of plant growth and development, not just the nutrients. No method will work without giving due consideration to CO2 and light. I'd say that light and CO2 trend to be far more important over all, but most aquarist fiddle a lot more with nutrients.

Folks do not read it even if you write though
Thanks for the write up

Regards,
Tom Barr
plantbrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2008, 11:13 AM   #5 (permalink)
Junior Aquascaper
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Faribault Minnesota
Posts: 1
Default Thank you!

Hello Tom, we have numerous discussions over the years, some things we agreed with and some not (ex. heating cables). Thank you for addressing the variables in the EI, some of my customers (our online aquarium plant store) who used EI had problems with it not understanding the issues you addressed here. I have always been a less is more kind of guy, I use the chart in the back of the Optimum Aquarium book for CO2 levels based on the carbonate hardness, and use fish loads and their feeding frequency and amounts in my personal tanks to maintain phosphates and nitrates (I never test once I establish levels according to fish load feeding schedules and amounts). I have been successful in avoiding algae and obtaining good vibrant plant growth this way. I have always changed 25 percent water per week. I also use small daily doses of ferts (micros, iron, potassium) in addition to weekly doses. I have never had to tear any of my personal aquariums down due to problems, some have been up and running over seven years. Again, thank you for the addendum to the EI method! Don Matakis
aquaticscapes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 08:56 PM   #6 (permalink)
Junior Aquascaper
 
Brilliant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat7676 View Post
Can you do this without using traces? Also what are good traces?
Depends on the requirements of plants. I use Tropica Master Grow - now called Tropica Plant Nutrition trace fertlizer. Its getting too expensive so I buy it by the 5liter when on sale or free shipping offer comes.

Like now...Tropica Plant Nutrition Liquid 5 Liter at Big Al's Online

Some great points made here. I would also like to add that I dose several weeks of this EI mix (and Tropica trace(on seperate pump)) in liquid form via autodoser. Works great that way too.
__________________
See more on my website at UpperOrchard.net
Brilliant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 10:50 PM   #7 (permalink)
Aspiring Aquascaper
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Singapore
Posts: 67
Default

In the article it mention "You should look at around 20-30ppm of NO3", is this daily concentration or weekly concentration? Do I need to dose KNO3 20-30ppm everyday?
__________________
-Robert
Shadow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2008, 10:23 AM   #8 (permalink)
PMD
Junior Aquascaper
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Posts: 1
Default

20-30 ppm of KNO3 is what should be maintained in the tank during the week, not added to it every day.

If you follow the EI recommendations for dosage of KNO3 during the week, then the proper level of KNO3 will be maintained for the entire week.

The 50% weekly water change just ensures that the added nutrients will never more than double in the tank.

Regards,

PMD
PMD is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Testing Method? JDowns Water Chemistry 1 07-03-2008 03:29 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:12 PM.